Connect with us

Uncategorized

Urantia Book Readers Call on Prospect High School to Retain Kulieke Name

Published

on

A campaign has been launched to remove the name of the former President of the Urantia Brotherhood, Alvin Kulieke, from the Kulieke Theater at Prospect High School in Mount Prospect, Illinois, where he served as the school’s very well-respected first principal. The campaign was launched by a 16-year-old student reporter, Abigail Gilliland, for the school newspaper, The Prospector.

Miss Gilliand was first prompted to condemn the late Mr. Kulieke, due to her discovery of a minstrel show having been performed at the school during his tenure in the 1950s. This is a perfect illustration of the failure of modern education to prepare students to enter imaginatively into the sensibilities and worldviews of the past, even the recent past. Because however peculiar minstrel shows seem to our modern sensibility, they remained a popular form of entertainment for close to one hundred years. We also find it odd that a modern form of entertainment which glorifies criminality, violence, and misogyny (hip-hop music) is deemed perfectly acceptable, but Al Jolson singing “Mammy”quelle horreur! One can only imagine how appalling the upright teachers and principals of yesteryear would find our modern entertainment.

The second indictment Ms. Gilliland levels against Mr. Kulieke is his early involvement with the Urantia Book, and despite the fact that the Urantia Book is headquartered in nearby Chicago, Miss Gilliand used a biographer of a cult leader in Arizona, who uses Urantia book terms and concepts but is not in any way affiliated with the movement proper, as her “expert source.” Here again is a failure of her teachers to instruct her to simply call or visit the Urantia Foundation itself as this should have been her primary source.

As part of its revelation to our world, the Uranta book carries a detailed narration of our distant past so that we may better understand where we came from and where we are going. According to the book, life does not arise spontaneously but is designed and implanted. Evolution likewise occurs by design specifically in order to create beings who are capable of knowing God and developing immortal souls. In this view, the physical body is nothing more than the substrate in which the potentially immortal soul is born and develops.

This is not to say that genetics are unimportant and according to the book, this is especially true with regard to the development and maintenance of civilization. Had Miss Gilliand actually read the book, she would have discovered that it advocates racial mixing: “Hybridization of superior and dissimilar stocks is the secret of the creation of new and more vigorous strains. And this is true of plants, animals, and the human species.”

Furthermore, the relatively mild form of eugenics advocated by the Urantia Book is nothing compared with the industrial scale elimination of the unborn occurring by way of official policy in the United States today. Over 63 million abortions have been performed since 1973 and this has certainly affected the gene pool to a far greater degree than anything advocated in the Urantia book, which was written in the early years of the last century, decades before “the pill” came into being or abortion became widespread. Francis Galton, who coined the term “eugenics” in 1904, was only advocating polices to encourage young people to marry earlier and have more children, while at the same time discouraging the reproduction of the most anti-social, parasitic criminals, which, if they are incarcerated, are unlikely to reproduce in any case.

“Today the word ‘eugenics’ is often used as a scare tactic due to its use to describe the peculiar experiments performed in Nazi Germany,” said Urantia Corps for Spiritual Progress founder Rebecca Bynum, “but this does not discount the solid genetic research which is now being done. In vitro fertilization, gene therapy, and CRISPR gene editing are just the beginning of a revolution in modern genetics which will enhance the health and vitality of future generations. The knee-jerk condemnation of this research is unnecessary and unwise.

“Yes, the Urantia book uses terms such as ‘better and worse,’ ‘higher and lower,’ ‘superior and inferior,’ which have all but been eliminated from academic discourse when it comes to human beings and culture; however, the average person using common sense knows those terms still apply,” she said.

In conclusion, the Urantia Corps for Spiritual Progress strongly objects to the proposed removal of Alvin Kulieke’s name from the Kulieke Theater at Prospect High School. The hysteria employed by Miss Gilliand implying that Mr. Kulieke advocated for the elimination of the “neurodivergent” is absurd and defamatory and we call on the school administration to reconsider this hasty move based on the inadequate research of a 16-year-old student.

The Press Release Urantia Book Readers Call on Prospect High School to Retain Kulieke Name appeared first on Pinion Newswire.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Uncategorized

Zoomex Officially Joins CODE VASP Alliance

Published

on

November 7, 2025 — Global cryptocurrency exchange Zoomex today announced that it has officially joined the Korea CODE VASP Alliance (Connect Digital Exchanges) and completed integration with the Travel Rule compliance system. This key technological integration marks Zoomex’s adherence to the security and transparency standards required under FATF travel rule framework for digital asset transactions.

The CODE VASP Alliance was established in 2022 to help Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) meet Travel rule compliance. Through this system, exchanges can securely transmit encrypted sender and receiver identity information during asset transfers, aligning with international standards set by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF).

zoomex Zoomex Officially Joins CODE VASP Alliance

“For us, compliance is not just a procedural requirement — it’s a foundation of trust.” — Zoomex CEO
“Successfully completing the technical integration with the CODE system is a vital step toward ensuring transaction security and enhancing information transparency. It also reflects our ongoing commitment to strengthening our infrastructure.”

This collaboration not only enhances transaction security and system transparency but also provides users with a stable and trustworthy trading environment tailored to the global market.

In addition to joining CODE, Zoomex holds multiple regulatory licenses, including Canada MSB, U.S. MSB, U.S. NFA, and Australia AUSTRAC, and has successfully passed a security audit by Hacken, a leading international cybersecurity firm. Zoomex remains committed to building a more reliable, transparent, and compliant digital asset trading ecosystem.

About Zoomex
Founded in 2021, Zoomex is a global cryptocurrency exchange serving over 3 million users across 35+ countries and regions, offering more than 600 trading pairs. Guided by its core values of “Simple × Intuitive × Fast,” Zoomex delivers millisecond-level trade execution and a seamless user experience through its optimized matching engine and minimalist interface.
As the official partner of the Haas F1 Team and exclusive global brand ambassador Emiliano Martínez (World-Class Goalkeeper), Zoomex extends the speed and precision of the racetrack into its trading services.

About the Korea CODE VASP Alliance
The Korea CODE VASP Alliance is a consortium of leading Korean cryptocurrency exchanges dedicated to advancing compliance and regulatory standards in the digital asset sector.
The alliance promotes the adoption of the CODE Travel Rule solution, ensuring transparency and traceability in crypto transactions in line with global anti–money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing (CTF) standards.
Its mission is to foster a safer and more reliable crypto environment for users and industry stakeholders alike.

 

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Alona Lebedieva: Reparation Bonds — A Path to Using Frozen Russian Assets for the Benefit of Ukraine

Published

on

Frozen billions: a source of resources and political debate

20251015a Alona Lebedieva: Reparation Bonds — A Path to Using Frozen Russian Assets for the Benefit of Ukraine

The full-scale war launched by the Russian Federation against Ukraine has been ongoing for more than three and a half years. During this time, the West has frozen a colossal volume of Russian state foreign currency reserves — about USD 300 billion.

Without exaggeration, this is the most effective Western sanction, as otherwise Russia could have used this money to wage war against Ukraine. Of this amount, over EUR 200 billion is held in European Union countries, with the remainder in G7 states such as the United Kingdom, Japan, Canada, the United States, as well as in Switzerland.

The largest portion of these assets is concentrated in Belgium: approximately EUR 190 billion of the Russian Central Bank’s assets — nearly two thirds of all frozen reserves — are held at the Brussels-based securities depository Euroclear. At the same time, these funds are not simply lying dormant. Financial institutions place them in risk-free deposits at central banks and receive interest income.

Due to high rates in recent years, the frozen Russian billions have generated significant excess profits. In 2023 alone, Euroclear earned about EUR 4.4 billion in interest on Russian assets, and in 2024 this amount grew to nearly EUR 7 billion. Formally, this income does not belong to Russia but to the financial intermediaries themselves, as sanctions prohibit transferring interest to the actual owner.

European countries support Ukraine by directing a significant part of the interest earned from the immobilised sovereign Russian assets to Kyiv. However, they also face their own economic difficulties and domestic political resistance, as taxpayers are unwilling to directly finance support for Ukraine. To reduce pressure on national budgets, more and more politicians are inclined to use frozen Russian sovereign assets as the main source of financing assistance for Ukraine. At the same time, EU countries justifiably avoid confiscating these assets, as such a step would inevitably lead to lawsuits from Russia — and the outcome of such cases is difficult to predict.

From interest to loans: the evolution of the Western approach

Throughout 2023–2024, Western states reached an understanding that at least the interest income from frozen reserves should be directed to support Ukraine. In October 2024, the G7 countries agreed on a joint mechanism — Extraordinary Revenue Acceleration loans (ERA-loans) — amounting to USD 50 billion.

Under this scheme, allies provide loans to Ukraine now (in total, under the ERA instrument, the Ministry of Finance has already raised EUR 14 billion from the European Union), and repayment will be made from future income generated by the placement of frozen Russian assets. The G7 established that this excess income is not part of the reserves themselves and therefore is not protected by Russia’s sovereign immunity. This opened the possibility of using it without violating international law.

The European Union soon introduced corresponding regulation: since early 2024, European depositories have been prohibited from disposing of the excess income independently, and the EU Council obtained the authority to direct part of these funds to support Ukraine. This compromise became the first practical step towards ensuring that frozen Russian assets begin to work to the benefit of the victim of aggression.

The reparation bonds mechanism: a creative alternative to confiscation

Despite the success in using interest, the question of the principal amount of frozen assets remained unresolved. Direct confiscation of Russian reserves faces legal obstacles, as a state’s sovereign funds are protected by international law. This is why in 2025 the EU began to consider a new idea — a reparation loan.

However, implementation of this idea is currently stalled: EU member states have not yet agreed on a single legal model. The most difficult aspect is the position of Belgium, where most of the assets are held. Prime Minister Bart De Wever publicly stated that he would support the plan only if there are clear legal guarantees of the scheme’s legality, collective risk-sharing between all EU member states, and the involvement of other G7 members. Brussels is wary of a situation in which sanctions are lifted, and Russia demands the return of reserves already used to support Ukraine. It should be noted that if one imagines being the head of the Belgian government acting in the interests of one’s own country, such a position is entirely understandable.

Most European countries — including Germany, France, Italy, Sweden, Poland, and the Baltic states — support the creation of a reparation loan. At the October 2025 summit, EU leaders (with the exception of Hungary) agreed in principle that Russian assets must remain frozen until aggression ends and compensation is paid.

Russia is predictably reacting strongly negatively to these plans, calling them “theft” and “piracy.” It is preparing legal claims, but their chances of success are minimal. A consensus is emerging at the international level: a state that has launched aggression cannot count on the inviolability of its financial reserves.

Nevertheless, the EU continues to work on the technical parameters of a scheme that would allow unlocking financing without direct confiscation of assets. The concept is that the G7 and EU countries would sign an international agreement fixing the intention not to unfreeze Russian assets until compensation for damage caused to Ukraine is paid. Based on this agreement, a Ukraine Recovery Fund would be established, with member states and Ukraine itself as founders. Banks holding the frozen assets would issue bonds for the Fund in an amount equivalent to these assets, secured by them, and at a minimal interest rate — for example, 0.1% per annum — and provide these funds to Ukraine.

The resources received would be directed by the Fund to finance the recovery and development of the Ukrainian economy, acting as a coordinator and controller of the targeted use of funds. This approach resembles a modernised “Marshall Plan” that combines financial assistance with transparent oversight mechanisms.

The scheme would avoid what the “collective West” fears — Russian assets would not be confiscated, and there would be no formal link between them and the funds provided to the Fund, as the money is transferred to Ukraine through bonds issued by the banks holding the frozen Russian assets. Meanwhile, Ukraine could access the funds in a fairly short timeframe.

If Russia eventually agrees to pay reparations, these funds would be credited to the Fund’s account and directed towards repayment of the loans. If not, the loans effectively become perpetual, and the frozen assets gradually lose real value.

Reparation bonds as a preventive security mechanism

If the EUR 140 billion reparation loan plan is approved, Ukraine would receive approximately EUR 45 billion annually in 2026–2028. This is a significant sum, capable of covering a substantial portion of defence, social, and infrastructure needs.

However, if the direct loan mechanism does not work — and there are preconditions to believe this — attention should shift to the reparation bonds mechanism proposed in this article, which may have a better chance of implementation.

Still, the significance of providing funds to Ukraine goes far beyond financial calculations.

In fact, this could be the first case in which the international community compels an aggressor to pay during an ongoing war (unlike the situation when Iraq paid reparations to Kuwait — payments began only after the war ended). Reparation bonds transform frozen assets from an instrument of leverage into a source of accountability and justice.

If implemented, the mechanism may become not only a financial solution but also a strategic precedent that will reshape the international security architecture. It will demonstrate that no state can avoid punishment for aggression, and its currency reserves will no longer guarantee immunity. This is precisely how Europe can prevent new wars and stop Russia from further attacks on neighbouring countries.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Point72 Launches AI-Powered Financial System in Indonesia Under the Leadership of Mr. Cheong Jin Hui

Published

on

Point72, a global asset management firm, announced the official launch of its AI-powered financial system in Indonesia, led by Mr. Cheong Jin Hui, Head Representative of Indonesia. The new system is designed to strengthen the firm’s local investment capabilities, offering clients more precise analytics, predictive modeling, and real-time risk monitoring tailored to Indonesia’s rapidly evolving market.

The platform utilizes machine learning, natural language processing, and real-time market intelligence to identify investment opportunities and manage portfolio risks more effectively. This innovation marks a major step in Point72’s long-term strategy to integrate artificial intelligence into every aspect of its global operations — from research and trading to client advisory and compliance oversight.

“AI is transforming how we understand markets,” said Mr. Cheong Jin Hui. “By bringing Point72’s advanced AI technology to Indonesia, we’re equipping local investors and institutions with tools that combine data-driven intelligence with human expertise. Our goal is to help clients make faster, smarter, and more confident decisions.”

Point72’s AI system also features an adaptive analytics engine that continuously learns from market patterns, enhancing forecasting accuracy and portfolio resilience. With this deployment, Point72 aims to position Indonesia as one of the firm’s key innovation hubs in Southeast Asia, driving growth through technology and talent collaboration.

About Point72

Point72 is a global asset management firm that invests in multiple asset classes and strategies worldwide. The firm combines deep fundamental research, advanced analytics, and cutting-edge technology to deliver long-term value for its clients. Headquartered in Stamford, Connecticut, Point72 operates across North America, Europe, and Asia.

Continue Reading

Trending